| 释义 |
Definition of modus ponens in English: modus ponensnoun ˌməʊdəs ˈpəʊnɛnzˌmōdəs ˈpōnenz 1The rule of logic which states that if a conditional statement (‘if p then q’) is accepted, and the antecedent (p) holds, then the consequent (q) may be inferred. 肯定前件的假言推理，取拒式 Example sentencesExamples - He maintained that these methodological principles underlie evaluative practice in science just as modus ponens underlies deductive inference.
- It could be a premise either, as some say, as the premise of a propositional scheme such as the modus ponens, or, as others assume, as the conditional premise of a hypothetical syllogism.
- This formal fallacy is often mistaken for modus ponens, a valid form of reasoning also using a conditional.
- The statement that q follows by modus ponens from the other two stated as known in the antecedent of the subjunctive principle P; this principle counts on the person to draw the inference to q.
- From a conditional statement, one can construct two types of valid inference: modus ponens and modus tollens.
- We also noted that one of the most fundamental inferences concerning the conditional is modus ponens: a, a c c.
- 1.1 An argument using the rule of modus ponens.
取拒式论证 Example sentencesExamples - The first three points are a valid form of argument, in the form of modus ponens.
- Consider, for example, propositional logic: here one can start from self-evident axioms and proceed to deduce theorems by argument forms - modus ponens, for example - that are themselves self-evidently valid in an obvious sense.
- Robustness was meant to ensure that an assertable conditional is fit for modus ponens.
OriginLatin, literally 'mood that affirms'. Definition of modus ponens in US English: modus ponensnounˌmōdəs ˈpōnenz 1The rule of logic stating that if a conditional statement (“if p then q”) is accepted, and the antecedent (p) holds, then the consequent (q) may be inferred. 肯定前件的假言推理，取拒式 Example sentencesExamples - He maintained that these methodological principles underlie evaluative practice in science just as modus ponens underlies deductive inference.
- From a conditional statement, one can construct two types of valid inference: modus ponens and modus tollens.
- The statement that q follows by modus ponens from the other two stated as known in the antecedent of the subjunctive principle P; this principle counts on the person to draw the inference to q.
- It could be a premise either, as some say, as the premise of a propositional scheme such as the modus ponens, or, as others assume, as the conditional premise of a hypothetical syllogism.
- This formal fallacy is often mistaken for modus ponens, a valid form of reasoning also using a conditional.
- We also noted that one of the most fundamental inferences concerning the conditional is modus ponens: a, a c c.
- 1.1 An argument using modus ponens.
取拒式论证 Example sentencesExamples - Consider, for example, propositional logic: here one can start from self-evident axioms and proceed to deduce theorems by argument forms - modus ponens, for example - that are themselves self-evidently valid in an obvious sense.
- Robustness was meant to ensure that an assertable conditional is fit for modus ponens.
- The first three points are a valid form of argument, in the form of modus ponens.
OriginLatin, literally ‘mood that affirms’. |